When the Premier League filed 115 charges against Manchester City in February 2023, it was the most ambitious enforcement action in the league’s history. More than three years on, a verdict still hasn’t arrived — and the delay has become its own story. Here’s where things stand, where the process went quiet, and what consequences could actually follow.

Number of Charges: 115 ·
Alleged Breaches: FFP rules ·
Current Status: Hearing ongoing ·
Recent Development: Verdict delay reported ·
Key Concern: Premier League title race

Quick snapshot

1Confirmed facts
  • 115 alleged FFP breaches filed in February 2023 (ESPN)
  • Hearing ran 12 weeks (Sept 16–Dec 6, 2024) (Sky Sports)
  • Investigation opened Dec 2018 after Football Leaks (ESPN)
2What’s unclear
3Timeline signal
  • Hearing concluded Dec 2024; deliberation ongoing (Sports Illustrated)
  • Pep Guardiola expected verdict within one month (Feb 2025) — that window passed without resolution (Sports Illustrated)
  • Premier League chief declined to comment Feb 2026 (Sports Illustrated)
4What’s next
  • Three-person panel deliberating; both sides retain 14-day appeal rights (Sports Illustrated)
  • Appeals cannot reach CAS; decision would be final (Sports Illustrated)
Field Detail
Club Involved Manchester City
Charge Count 115
Type of Charges FFP breaches
Status Pending verdict
Recent Update Fresh delay announced

What Are the Latest Updates on Man City’s 115 FFP Charges?

By every confirmed account, the independent commission concluded its work in December 2024. The three-person panel has since been deliberating behind closed doors — and that silence is where the uncertainty lives.

Investigation began in December 2018 following Football Leaks revelations published by Der Spiegel, which alleged that Manchester City disguised owner funding as sponsorship revenue and failed to disclose payments to players and managers during the 2009–2018 period (ESPN). The public confirmation came only after a March 2021 High Court ruling forced City to surrender documents (ESPN), and formal charges followed in February 2023 (Sports Illustrated).

Recent verdict delays

Pep Guardiola said in February 2025 that the verdict would arrive “in one month” (Sports Illustrated). That window came and went. Premier League chief Richard Masters refused to comment at the Financial Times Business of Football Summit in February 2026, saying he had “spent three years not commenting” and would not start then (Sports Illustrated). No official update has emerged from the Premier League since the hearing ended (Sports Illustrated).

Editor’s note

The Premier League has no hard deadline for delivering a verdict. Unlike UEFA’s FFP cases, which operate under stricter timelines, the Premier League’s rules allow for an open-ended deliberation process — a point that has frustrated clubs watching the title race unfold.

Premier League hearing status

The case was heard at London’s International Dispute Resolution Centre, with media confirming lawyers’ presence through photographs (ESPN). Manchester City referenced the hearing’s conclusion in their 2024–25 annual report, the only formal acknowledgment from the club (ESPN).

Bottom line: The pattern: confidentiality has been the default posture from both sides throughout the process. Case complexity — 115 charges spanning nearly a decade — is cited as the primary reason for delays (Goal.com).

What Happened to Man City 115 Charges?

The case against Manchester City is broad by design. The Premier League charges break into several categories: 54 counts of allegedly failing to provide accurate financial information, 14 related to player and manager payments, 7 Profit and Sustainability Rule (PSR) breaches, 5 UEFA FFP failures, and 35 counts of non-cooperation from 2018 onward (ESPN).

Why this matters

The scope of 115 charges — many spanning years — makes this structurally different from standard PSR cases against smaller clubs. A points deduction that might cost a mid-table club European qualification could cost Manchester City the league title, or worse.

Overview of charges

The investigation traces back to a December 2018 leak of internal documents, which the Premier League used to build its case. City challenged document access in court and lost in March 2021 — a turning point that opened the door to formal charges two years later (ESPN).

The club’s position has been consistent: Manchester City claims it possesses “irrefutable evidence” in its defense and denies all charges (ESPN).

Legal battle summary

The hearing before the independent commission ran for 12 weeks (Sky Sports). Both the Premier League and Manchester City retain 14 days to appeal any verdict, and notably, no appeal can reach the Court of Arbitration for Sport — the final decision would be binding within English football’s structure (Sports Illustrated).

This stands in contrast to the 2020 UEFA case, where City’s two-year European ban was overturned by CAS within five months (Sky Sports).

What Happens if Man City is Found Guilty?

Possible sanctions include expulsion from the Premier League, stripping of titles won during the breach period, or substantial points deductions that could drop the club well below the title race. Fines are also on the table — though financial penalties alone would likely be seen as insufficient given the scale of the allegations.

Potential sanctions

The Premier League has no hard ceiling on sanctions, and precedent from comparable cases is limited. Everton received a 10-point deduction in 2023 for a PSR breach, later reduced to 6 on appeal. Forest faced a 4-point penalty in 2024. Manchester City’s case is far larger in scope, with breaches allegedly spanning 2009–2018 (Sky Sports).

The confidentiality of arbitration means no one outside the process knows exactly what punishment range the commission is considering. The verdict, once delivered, will come with written reasoning — but the deliberation itself remains private.

Impact on titles

City, owned by Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan, won three Premier League titles during the alleged breach period (Sports Illustrated). If the commission determines that breaches affected competitive integrity during those seasons, title stripping becomes a theoretical option — however unlikely the commission may view that outcome.

Why is the Man City Verdict Taking So Long?

The short answer: 115 charges is an extraordinary volume for any commission to evaluate. The longer answer involves procedural design, confidentiality rules, and the precedent-setting stakes of getting this right.

Reasons for delays

Process complexity is cited as the main driver of delays (Goal.com). The commission must evaluate evidence across nearly a decade of financial records, sponsorship agreements, and player contracts. Both sides submitted extensive documentation; the commission’s written verdict must address each category of charges.

The Premier League maintains strict confidentiality around ongoing proceedings, providing no public updates or timeline commitments (Sports Illustrated). Masters repeated this stance in July 2025, telling NBC that providing any detail would violate the league’s own rules (Sky Sports).

Complexity of case

Some outlets report the actual charge count may be higher than 115 — Sky Sports notes reports citing 130 charges, while other sources mentioned 134 (Sky Sports). The discrepancy likely reflects how charges are categorized internally versus the public-facing Premier League statement.

Post-hearing, the commission faces several more months of work given the volume of material (Sky Sports).

Did Man City Win the Court Case?

No verdict has been delivered. The hearing ended, but the commission continues its deliberations.

Current legal status

As of early 2026, no decision has been issued. Sports Illustrated confirms no official updates since December 2024 (Sports Illustrated).

No final decision yet

One YouTube source claimed Manchester City was cleared on April 24, 2026 via settlement — an unverified claim not corroborated by any tier 1 or tier 2 outlet (YouTube). Given the research confidence remains low on case timing, readers should treat such claims with caution and rely on established sports publications for confirmed updates.

Verdict timing was projected unlikely before summer 2025, potentially extending past the August 16 season start date for the 2025/26 campaign (Goal.com).

What to watch

The Premier League has no stated deadline for the verdict. Any resolution — whether a finding of guilt, an acquittal, or a settlement — will emerge when the commission is ready, not on any public schedule. Until tier 1 or tier 2 sources confirm an outcome, the case remains open.

What We Know — and What We Don’t

Confirmed

  • 115 charges filed in February 2023
  • Hearing ran September 16–December 6, 2024
  • Investigation opened December 2018 after Football Leaks
  • City denies all charges; claims “irrefutable evidence”
  • Both sides retain 14-day appeal rights
  • Appeals cannot reach CAS; decision is final

Unconfirmed

  • Verdict date or outcome
  • Whether settlement discussions occurred
  • Exact range of potential punishments
  • Whether charges affect specific titles
  • Timeline for resolution

What the Key Figures Said

“I simply can’t comment. Having spent three years not commenting, I’m not going to start now.”

— Richard Masters, Premier League chief (Sports Illustrated)

“You can ask but our rules are very clear, it’s a confidential process so I can’t give any information on timing.”

— Richard Masters, Premier League chief (Sky Sports)

“I simply think that the verdict would come out in one month.”

— Pep Guardiola, Manchester City manager (Sports Illustrated)

“City have ‘irrefutable evidence’ to support their position.”

— Manchester City, club statement (ESPN)

Bottom line: Manchester City still faces 115 financial charges with no verdict delivered as of early 2026. The three-person commission continues its private deliberations with no stated deadline. For rival clubs, the uncertainty disrupts title-race planning — for City, the wait is both a legal and reputational burden. Watch for any formal statement from the Premier League or City in their next annual or quarterly communications; those filings have historically been the only confirmed public signals from the club’s side.

Related reading: Man City vs AFC Bournemouth Stats – 18 Wins in 19 Matches · Man City vs Real Madrid Stats – Head-to-Head Record and Recent Results

Additional sources

youtube.com

Related coverage: full breakdown and timeline fördjupar bilden av Man City 115 Charges – Full Breakdown, Timeline and Updates.

Frequently asked questions

What are the 115 charges against Manchester City?

They are alleged breaches of Premier League financial fair play rules, primarily relating to the 2009–2018 period. Charges include 54 counts of failing to provide accurate financial information, 14 related to player and manager payments, 7 PSR breaches, 5 UEFA FFP failures, and 35 counts of non-cooperation.

When were the Man City FFP charges announced?

February 2023, more than four years after the Premier League investigation began in December 2018.

Who is hearing the Man City 115 charges case?

An independent commission of three members appointed by the Premier League. Their identities are not publicly confirmed, and deliberations are confidential.

Can Manchester City still win the Premier League amid charges?

Yes — as of early 2026, no verdict has been issued and the club remains in competition. The title race continues under the cloud of an unresolved case.

What has the Premier League said about the delays?

Chief executive Richard Masters has repeatedly declined to comment, stating confidentiality rules prevent any disclosure of timing or procedural details.

Are there updates from official sources on the verdict?

No confirmed updates since the hearing concluded in December 2024. Media reports citing anonymous sources or unverified online claims should be treated with caution until tier 1 or tier 2 outlets report an outcome.

How does the case affect other clubs?

The uncertainty ripples across the league. A points deduction applied mid-season could alter the title race retroactively. A settlement could set precedent for how financial rules are enforced going forward.